|
It's too good to be true. Prices are northbound and are
continuing at a pace that exceeds all estimates. The term " volcanic
rise" was used in an earlier context of steel price rise. But the
recent phenomenon has made even that description incongruous. Asked about
the unprecedented rise in Sensex the common answer is "feel good"
factor. Is there so much to feel good? Why it is confined to steel only
and much less in other manufactured items? First, let us measure the extent
of rise in international prices as reported in reputed sources and compare
them with the past 7 years.
Movement of FOB prices (US$/t)
|
Item
|
Source
|
Jan’04
|
Jan’03
|
Jan’02
|
Jan’01
|
Jan’00
|
Jan’99
|
Jan’98
|
Jan’97
|
Annual
average growth in 7 yrs
|
|
HRC
|
ECSC
|
360
|
305
|
195
|
205
|
310
|
202
|
335
|
312
|
2.1
|
|
|
China (C&F)
|
432
|
340
|
185
|
167
|
257
|
165
|
247
|
267
|
7.1
|
|
|
CIS
|
405
|
310
|
222
|
255
|
300
|
245
|
322
|
352
|
2.1
|
|
CRC
|
ECSC
|
435
|
390
|
265
|
310
|
387
|
310
|
420
|
382
|
1.9
|
|
|
China (C&F)
|
515
|
442
|
235
|
262
|
325
|
255
|
335
|
380
|
4.4
|
|
|
CIS
|
495
|
390
|
222
|
255
|
300
|
245
|
322
|
352
|
5.0
|
|
Hy Plate
|
ECSC
|
480
|
320
|
335
|
367
|
360
|
380
|
510
|
440
|
1.3
|
|
|
CIS
|
370
|
260
|
190
|
195
|
185
|
220
|
257
|
232
|
6.9
|
|
GP
|
ECSC
|
450
|
460
|
355
|
365
|
455
|
425
|
615
|
650
|
(-) 5.1
|
|
|
China (C&F)
|
605
|
575
|
317
|
375
|
425
|
425
|
555
|
575
|
0.7
|
|
Billet
|
CIS
|
375
|
225
|
152
|
150
|
141
|
132
|
185
|
195
|
9.8
|
|
|
China (C&F)
|
407
|
247
|
172
|
177
|
169
|
155
|
|
226
|
8.8
|
|
W/Rods
|
ECSC
|
330
|
310
|
205
|
205
|
230
|
222
|
287
|
280
|
2.4
|
Before we analyse the above contents, a few things need
to be mentioned. The reported prices are average transaction prices. However
they may not exactly reflect the month of transactions keeping in view the
periodic nature of price reporting for the journals. Secondly, the imports
by China, shown in C&F terms, may be sourced from either European/ CIS
countries or Japan/South Korea, its largest trading partners.
The export prices of Heavy Plates
from European sources in 1998 exceeded the current price in 2004. And
in GP the present European prices are lower than in 2003, 2000, 1998 and
1997. Apart from these two cases, the prices in other categories in 2004
are substantially higher than those ruling in 1997 although there have
been years during the whole series when the prices registered a decline.
Looking at the average growth rates
in prices over the last few years, the maximum increase has taken place
in Billet from CIS sources, closely followed by Chinese import prices
of the same item. Among other categories the rise in HR Coil import prices
by China has also observed a high growth in the past. This is interesting
as both these items fall in the category of basic input of a host of other
downstream steel products.
In general it is seen that prices
in all items went down sharply in 2002 from their levels in 2001 and 2000.
No doubt the year 2002 brought in a long phase of poor demand, excess
supply and low realisation with consequent adverse impact on profitability
for the majority of steel producers all over the world. This also resulted
in a series of protective trade measures (Section 201 and safeguard duty
actions) by USA, EU and China. Global prices begun the northbound journey
by the last quarter of 2002 and since then, except Q2 of 2003, they never
looked back. Some analysts have commented on the years of restructuring
and consolidation by major steel producers in USA and EU, the consistent
efforts by OECD steel committee to bring about effective steps to cut
down government subsidies for maintaining inefficient capacities. On a
hindsight all these factors appear to contribute to the turnaround of
the steel industry. But the primary issue remained to be the demand pull
that lent a legitimacy to all the rearguard steps that various major steel
producing countries of the world adopted in order to protect the ailing
steel producers. The growing steel demand from China and significant expansion
of domestic demand in other developing countries including India sustained
the equilibrium between demand and supply and pushed up the price level.
Currently the increasing trend in
prices of basic inputs for steel making like coal, iron ore, scrap and
electricity as well as freight has largely contributed to rise in steel
prices which otherwise would have maintained a lower growth due to damand
escalation alone. The current prices of coke at US$ 125/t, of iron ore
at US$ 83/t, of scrap at US$ 232/t are considerably higher than the prices
ruling a few months earlier. Further there seems to be a huge shortage
in availability in these basic inputs compared to demand that have necessitated
the rather abnormal rise in prices of finished steel. At the current level,
the landed import costs to India are much higher than those ruling a year
earlier as the table below reflects.
Comparison of landed cost of imports
| Category
|
Landed
cost in Jan’04 with revised duty (Rs/t): CIS source |
Landed
cost in Jan’03 (Rs/t): CIS source |
Difference
(Rs/t) |
| HR
Coils (CIS) |
Rs. 28165/-
|
Rs.24400/-
|
Rs.3765/-
|
| CR
Coils (ECSC) |
Rs. 30385/-
|
Rs.30425/-
|
(-) Rs.40/-
|
| CR
Coils (CIS) |
Rs. 34185/-
|
Rs.30425/-
|
Rs.3760/-
|
| Billets
(CIS) |
Rs.26265/-
|
Rs.18375/-
|
Rs.7890/-
|
While a 15% rise in prices in HR
Coils over a period of one year can largely be accounted for by the factors
mentioned above, a rise as high as 43% in the price of Billets over the
same period is inexplicable. And here the issue of availability becomes
the centrepiece of discussion. It is quite evident that shortage in Billets
is more precarious than that in HR Coils. It is therefore a matter of
days when the global prices of end products rolled out of Billets, eg
Merchant and reinfocement Bars and Structurals would register a steep
upward movement. CR Coils present an interesting picture. The import cost
of European sourced CR Coils has not moved up in January'04. All increase
has taken place in CIS sourced item. This is merely coincidental and not
much significance may be attached to this. It is, however apparent that
global price rise has nullified the impact of duty reduction and currency
appreciation vis-à-vis dollar. The above calculation also prove
that imports are no longer a viable option for the buyers since in almost
all categories the domestic prices are lower than the imported price.
The booming indigenous demand particularly from the new projects in the
infrastructure sector and other processing industries under such a scenario
would in all likelihood lead to a gradual rise in the domestic prices
in the coming months.
It is a difficult choice for Indian
steel producers not to export a higher component of their production and
earmark more tonnages for the domestic market. The export realisation
for all steel items even with a reduced level of DEPB rates is much higher
than the domestic realisation. The immediate pressure is rightly felt
on higher capacity utilisation in rolling facilities available with each
steel producer as the current market realisation may fully compensate
the full costs of production and make idle capacities simply unjustified.
Massive expansion of sponge iron facilities in the country has made the
EAF/IF units mostly immune from the steep rise in price of melting scrap,
a phenomenon unique in this part of the globe.
|